Redefining most cancers analysis for therapeutic breakthroughs


  • Wen H, Wang HY, He X, Wu CI. On the low reproducibility of most cancers research. Natl Sci Rev. 2018;5:619–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwy021

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim D, Hasford J. Redundant trials will be prevented, if the EU scientific trial regulation is utilized duly. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21:107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00536-9

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ioannidis JPA. The mass manufacturing of redundant, deceptive, and conflicted systematic evaluations and meta-analyses. Milbank Q. 2016;94:485–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jia Y, Wen J, Qureshi R, Ehrhardt S, Celentano DD, Wei X, et al. Impact of redundant scientific trials from mainland China evaluating statins in sufferers with coronary artery illness: cross-sectional examine. BMJ. 2021;372:n48. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n48

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Da Silva JAT. Points and challenges to reproducibility of most cancers analysis: a commentary. Future Oncol. 2022;18:1417–22. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2021-1378

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DeVita VT, Chu E. A historical past of most cancers chemotherapy. Most cancers Res. 2008;68:8643–53. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6611

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huh HD, Kim S. Historical past of radiation remedy know-how. Prog Med Phys. 2020;31:124–34. https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2020.31.3.124

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abshire D, Lang MK. The evolution of radiation remedy in treating most cancers. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2018;34:151–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2018.03.006

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haslam A, Prasad V. Estimation of the proportion of us sufferers with most cancers who’re eligible for and reply to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy medication. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e192535. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2535

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Choi G, Shin G, Bae SJ. Worth and prejudice? The worth of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell remedy. Int J Environ Res Public Well being. 2022;19:12366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912366

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kurtovic-Kozaric A, Vranic S, Kurtovic S, Hasic A, Kozaric M, Granov N, et al. Lack of entry to focused most cancers therapy modalities within the creating world within the period of precision drugs: real-life classes from Bosnia. J Glob Oncol. 2018;4:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.2016.008698

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bhullar KS, Lagarón NO, McGowan EM, Parmar I, Jha A, Hubbard BP, et al. Kinase-targeted most cancers therapies: progress, challenges and future instructions. Mol Most cancers. 2018;17:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12943-018-0804-2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tanda ET, Vanni I, Boutros A, Andreotti V, Bruno W, Ghiorzo P, et al. Present state of goal therapy in BRAF mutated melanoma. Entrance Mol Biosci. 2020;7:154 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.00154

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bédouelle E, Nguyen JM, Varey E, Khammari A, Dreno B. Ought to focused remedy be continued in braf-mutant melanoma sufferers after full remission? Dermatology. 2022;238:517–26. https://doi.org/10.1159/000518718

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mason S, Tovey P, Lengthy AF. Evaluating complementary drugs: methodological challenges of randomised managed trials. Br Med J. 2002;325:832–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7368.832

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ropers HH. Single gene issues come into focus—once more. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12:95. https://doi.org/10.31887/10.31887/dcns.2010.12.1/hhropers

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shi C, de Wit S, Učambarlić E, Markousis-Mavrogenis G, Screever EM, Meijers WC, et al. Multifactorial illnesses of the center, kidneys, lungs, and liver and incident most cancers: epidemiology and shared mechanisms. Cancers. 2023;15:729. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030729

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kesić S. Techniques biology, emergence and antireductionism. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2016;23:584–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.06.015

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Freeman J. In the direction of a definition of holism. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:154.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lim B, Lin Y, Navin N. Advancing most cancers analysis and drugs with single-cell genomics. Most cancers Cell. 2020;37:456–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.008

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang R, Li J, Zhou X, Mao Y, Wang W, Gao S, et al. Single-cell genomic and transcriptomic landscapes of main and metastatic colorectal most cancers tumors. Genome Med. 2022;14:93 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01093-z

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scott EC, Baines AC, Gong Y, Moore R, Pamuk GE, Saber H, et al. Developments within the approval of most cancers therapies by the FDA within the twenty-first century. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22:625–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-023-00723-4

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Most cancers statistics, 2023. CA Most cancers J Clin. 2023;73:17–48. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. International Most cancers Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 nations. CA Most cancers J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/CAAC.21660

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goyal R, Wassie MM, Winter J, Lathlean TJ, Younger GP, Symonds EL. Progress within the area of noninvasive diagnostics for colorectal most cancers: a scientific evaluation for the accuracy of blood-based biomarkers for detection of superior pre-cancerous lesions. Professional Rev Mol Diagn. 2023;23:1233–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2023.2290646

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin MJ, Svensson-Arvelund J, Lubitz GS, Marabelle A, Melero I, Brown BD, et al. Most cancers vaccines: the following immunotherapy frontier. Nat Most cancers. 2022;3:911–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/S43018-022-00418-6

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Park M, Leahey E, Funk RJ. Papers and patents have gotten much less disruptive over time. Nature. 2023;613:138–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin A, Giuliano CJ, Palladino A, John KM, Abramowicz C, Yuan ML, et al. Off-target toxicity is a standard mechanism of motion of most cancers medication present process scientific trials. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11:eaaw8412. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCITRANSLMED.AAW8412

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Foulkes I, Sharpless NE. Most cancers grand challenges: embarking on a brand new period of discovery. Most cancers Discov. 2021;11:23–7. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1657

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harris E. Most cancers moonshot plan introduced. JAMA. 2023;329:1443 https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2023.6252

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Most cancers Moonshot Progress – NCI n.d. https://www.most cancers.gov/analysis/key-initiatives/moonshot-cancer-initiative/progress (accessed 4 Dec 2023).

  • Mavrogenis AF, Quaile A, Scarlat MM. The great, the dangerous and the impolite peer-review. Int Orthop. 2020;44:413–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00264-020-04504-1

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barroga E. Modern methods for peer evaluation. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35:e138 https://doi.org/10.3346/JKMS.2020.35.E138

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nature will publish peer evaluation reviews as a trial. Nature. 2020;578:8. https://doi.org/10.1038/D41586-020-00309-9.

  • Hot Topics

    Related Articles