To encourage strong, good-faith dialogue about troublesome points, STAT publishes chosen Letters to the Editor acquired in response to First Opinion essays. As we speak’s version is a bit completely different: a letter about an essay on blood exams for detecting hidden colorectal most cancers and a response from the essay’s creator. Submit a Letter to the Editor right here, or discover the submission type on the finish of any First Opinion essay.
“Balancing hope and actuality: The promise and peril of blood-based colorectal most cancers screening,” by Folasade P. Could
I’ve been following the latest knowledge releases for blood-based colorectal most cancers screening exams with curiosity. This First Opinion essay by Dr. Could precisely characterizes the potential pitfalls of a blood-based technique; specifically that it might shift the scientific efficiency of colorectal most cancers screening packages from most cancers prevention to most cancers detection. This can be a step backwards from present options and would seemingly enhance the burden on sufferers and the well being care system.
A method for screening average-risk people that Dr. Could failed to say is non-invasive stool-based testing. This contains each multi-target stool DNA exams (mt-sDNA) and fecal immunochemical exams (FIT). (Disclosure: My employer, Polymedco, makes such a take a look at for colorectal most cancers.) These nicely established and United States Preventive Companies Job Power-supported strategies have higher sensitivity for detection of pre-malignant lesions at colonoscopy carried out on “optimistic” sufferers. Thus, they’re higher suited to an efficient prevention program.
However a serious distinction between mt-sDNA exams and FIT is price. A yearly FIT prices solely tens of {dollars}, is simple and handy for sufferers, and is supported by quite a few scientific research as being a extremely cost-effective strategy to determine these sufferers most definitely to profit from colonoscopy. sDNA exams even have the next price of false positives, doubtlessly driving extra folks to have colonoscopies who don’t want them. The so known as “FIT-first” strategy, utilizing FIT along with colonoscopy, is an correct and cost-effective method to display populations for colorectal most cancers that shouldn’t be ignored.
Because the cliché goes, the perfect take a look at is the one which will get finished. If blood-based screening is a extra enticing possibility for sure sufferers, then it might have some utility. However because the variety of people eligible for screening grows, we should always give attention to increasing use of the confirmed, cost-effective options that we have already got — like FIT.
— Dr. Todd W. Kelley, Vice President of Medical Affairs, Polymedco
***
Dr. Folasade Could responds:
Stool-based screening exams for colorectal most cancers, such because the one Dr. Kelley describes, are highly effective instruments within the mission towards prevention and early detection, and I strongly help their use. However individuals who use stool-based and different non-colonoscopic exams have to be conscious that these are two-step exams if the result’s irregular: the person must have a colonoscopy to finish the screening course of. Current nationwide knowledge present that solely about 50% of individuals with an irregular stool-based take a look at full a well timed colonoscopy.
The adage Dr. Kelley cites, “the perfect take a look at is the one which will get finished,” suggests that every one screening choices are equal. With the introduction of blood-based screening choices, we might have to think about whether or not that’s nonetheless right. Screening choices at present beneficial by the US Preventive Companies Job Power, together with stool-based exams, colonoscopy, and CT colonography, present the distinctive alternative to each detect most cancers and stop it by resulting in the elimination of pre-cancerous polyps earlier than they develop into cancerous. The blood-based exams for which I’ve seen knowledge merely can not try this. What we must be saying is “the perfect take a look at is a take a look at that may detect each polyps and cancers.”
— Folasade P. Could, M.D., a gastroenterologist, is director of high quality in digestive illnesses at UCLA Well being
