Introduction
Breast most cancers charges have been growing worldwide, notably amongst younger girls (1). Such speedy modifications within the incidence of early onset breast most cancers can’t be attributed solely to genetics, however moderately to interactions between well being behaviors and genes. Given many behavioral threat elements for breast most cancers are modifiable, public well being prevention and intervention research have lengthy sought to vary particular person well being behaviors and newer work acknowledges {that a} multi-faceted method is required to deal with these behaviors as a result of they’re complicated in nature (2).
On the identical time, cellular applied sciences, together with smartphone purposes (hereafter known as apps), have emerged as new instruments for delivering healthcare and health-related companies within the subject of most cancers and notably breast most cancers. In truth, practically half of all most cancers apps are focused towards breast most cancers (3). A latest evaluation suggests there are practically 600 publicly out there breast most cancers apps designed to offer illness and therapy data, to handle illness, and to lift total consciousness (4). With the widespread availability and use of purposes, researchers have a possibility to leverage this ubiquitous know-how for breast most cancers prevention. Nonetheless, the extent to which apps are included into breast most cancers prevention analysis throughout the most cancers management continuum is unknown.
Provided that the usage of apps for breast most cancers prevention continues to be within the early levels of adoption, the authors agreed {that a} systematic evaluation with a broad analysis scope was warranted. Subsequently, we carried out a scientific evaluation to reply the query: how are cellular apps getting used for breast most cancers prevention analysis throughout the most cancers management continuum, together with tertiary, secondary, and first prevention, in girls? Since the usage of apps in analysis is comparatively new, we additionally sought to establish at what phases of the analysis course of cellular apps have been getting used for breast most cancers analysis, together with protocol, growth, feasibility, pilot, effectiveness, and measurement research. Along with the systematic evaluation, we sought to search out frequent themes and gaps throughout the physique of literature.
Strategies
Search Technique
To be able to conduct this systematic evaluation, we utilized the Most popular Reporting Objects for Systematic Evaluations and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) pointers (5). We systematically reviewed PubMed and Net of Science Core Assortment databases in December 2018 (up to date February 7, 2019 to make sure the latest articles have been captured). Search phrases included breast most cancers, smartphone, cellular utility, and telephone app. These phrases have been utilized to all fields to be able to seize the best variety of articles. We additionally employed the managed vocabulary of Medical Topic Headings (MeSH), out there in PubMed solely, together with subheadings, for breast neoplasms and cellular apps. Supplementary Desk 1 consists of the entire search string because it was carried out in PubMed. We searched for extra articles utilizing the phrases mHealth, well being app, breast most cancers app, iPhone utility, and Android utility. Our search contained no restrictions concerning language or 12 months of publication. All references have been exported to Endnote (X8, Thompson Reuters). We first eliminated duplicate citations utilizing the automated characteristic after which manually reviewed articles for additions that had minor variations in the best way data was listed.
Inclusion/Exclusion Standards
Data have been screened in Endnote and included in the event that they have been revealed as an unique analysis article in English. The first reviewer [RH] then reviewed the full-text article for relevance to the research query. Articles have been excluded if research members have been suppliers or caregivers; if breast most cancers prevention was not an specific purpose or implication of the analysis; if the article didn’t embrace a cellular utility or solely mentioned that the analysis might be doubtlessly tailored right into a cellular utility; or if the smartphone was examined as a carcinogen. We additionally excluded books or e book chapters, assembly abstracts, non-empirical data (e.g., evaluations, editorials, and letters), non-English data, and data the place the full-text have been unavailable. When inclusion was unclear, authors LH and JAM independently reviewed the articles after which all authors mentioned till a consensus was met. LH and JAM additionally reviewed 20% of excluded articles for accuracy. In a single case the place we couldn’t attain consensus, we contacted the corresponding writer for clarification. Amongst all research that have been eligible for qualitative evaluation (n = 82), we flagged these research that had a number of publications reporting outcomes throughout totally different levels of analysis (e.g., a protocol and effectiveness research) however have been utilizing the identical underlying cohort (n = 23).
Knowledge Extraction and Evaluation
For research assembly the inclusion standards, the first reviewer [RH] extracted the next data from eligible research: inhabitants traits, pattern dimension, location of the research (nation), cellular utility identify (the place relevant), and research targets and/or outcomes (e.g., high quality of life, efficacy, literacy). We categorized research by prevention sort primarily based on whether or not they have been focusing on a secondary most cancers occasion and/or morbidity/mortality (tertiary), early analysis and therapy (secondary), or illness prevention (major). We assigned articles to just one prevention sort class. We additionally categorized research by analysis section primarily based on the research end result(s). Research categorized as Growth included these gathering data on participant curiosity and preferences for a cellular utility that was not but produced. Primarily based on options outlined by Orsmond and Cohn (6), we categorized Feasibility research as those who reported course of outcomes, comparable to usability of an app (6). We categorized Pilot research as these research the place the writer(s) self-described the research as such and/or the authors(s) point out {that a} bigger research was being deliberate to guage the effectiveness of an intervention. Typically, Pilot research reported outcomes amongst a small pattern, the place the typical pattern dimension was ~35. Effectiveness research reported end result measures from a full research; and a Protocol described the protocol for a research, comparable to for an effectiveness research, often within the title of the article itself. Measurement research have been those who reported outcomes associated to validity or reliability. Some research have been categorized throughout a number of analysis phases if papers mixed a number of outcomes; subsequently, analysis section classes weren’t mutually unique.
Our preliminary evaluation tabulated all articles eligible for qualitative evaluation by most cancers prevention sort and by analysis section. We then estimated the variety of articles revealed by 12 months. We used the subset of distinctive research and tabulated the variety of publications by nation and continent. Lastly, void of a priori hypotheses concerning frequent themes and gaps within the literature, we comprehensively reviewed distinctive research by most cancers prevention sort to establish frequent themes and gaps. We then extracted cellular app particulars and categorized app use by prevention sort and the provision of the app within the Apple and/or Android app retailer.
Outcomes
We recognized 199 data by our search, excluding duplicate data (Determine 1). Of those, we first screened the document title, summary, and reference sort for eligibility and excluded 83 data as ineligible. We then assessed the remaining 116 articles for eligibility by full-text evaluation and additional excluded 34 data. We recognized 82 research eligible for qualitative evaluation. Of the 82, we recognized 23 research that have been a part of a number of publications that used the identical underlying cohort to report outcomes throughout totally different analysis phases. Subsequently, we recognized 69 distinctive research, 75% (n = 52) have been tertiary, 12% (n = 8) have been secondary, and 13% (n = 9) have been major.
The Use of Cell Apps by Most cancers Prevention Kind and Analysis Section
As displayed in Determine 2, apps have been used throughout all phases of analysis with the predominant section being feasibility in tertiary prevention research (34%), effectiveness in secondary prevention research (63%), and growth (30%) and effectiveness (30%) in major prevention research. Throughout the most cancers prevention continuum, 14 research have been protocols (17%), 23 have been growth (28%), 23 have been feasibility (28%), 11 have been pilots (13%), 18 have been effectiveness (22%), and 9 have been measurement research (11%). Given 23 articles reported on a number of research phases, the classes weren’t mutually unique and percentages exceed 100%.

Determine 2. Using cellular apps throughout major, secondary, and tertiary breast most cancers prevention by analysis section (n = 82 eligible research).
Cell App Use: Progress and International Attain
The variety of research utilizing apps for breast most cancers prevention analysis elevated quickly over the past 10 years (Determine 3). The earliest research on this evaluation have been revealed in 2010, whereas the bulk (40%) have been revealed in 2018. There was worldwide use of apps in breast most cancers prevention analysis, except for Africa and South America (Determine 4). The research included on this evaluation have been carried out in 20 nations, with most research carried out within the US (43%) and a couple of research every occurring in Canada (7–9), China (10–12), Germany (13–15), Eire (16–18), Korea (19–24), the Netherlands (25–29), Spain (30, 31), and the UK (32–35). Tertiary prevention research happened in North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Western Europe (UK, Sweden, Netherlands, Germany, France, Spain Eire), and Asia (Korea, China, Japan, Singapore). Secondary prevention research have been primarily based in North America (US), Asia (Korea, China, India, Bangladesh), and Japanese Europe (Romania). Major prevention research have been primarily based in North America (US), Europe (Netherlands), and the Center East (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia).

Determine 3. Variety of research utilizing cellular apps for breast most cancers prevention analysis amongst girls by 12 months of publication (n = 82 eligible research). *The preliminary search was carried out in December 2018 and up to date February 7, 2019.
Overview of Cell Apps by Most cancers Prevention Sorts: Frequent Themes
Tertiary Prevention
Nearly all of cellular apps used for breast most cancers prevention analysis addressed tertiary prevention. We recognized 63 research (53 distinctive) (Desk 1) and the articles ranged throughout analysis phases together with growth (24.5%), feasibility with a give attention to course of (34%), pilots with a give attention to outcomes (18.9%), protocols (15.1%), effectiveness (16%), and measurement (11.3%) (Determine 2).

Desk 1. Articles utilizing cellular apps for tertiary breast most cancers prevention (n = 63 eligible research).
We recognized two frequent themes for the usage of cellular well being apps in tertiary breast most cancers prevention: scientific care coordination and well being associated high quality of life throughout and after a breast most cancers analysis. Most cancers care coordination research targeted on the assist and communication between the breast most cancers affected person and the doctor (32, 41, 47, 48, 66, 68), in addition to particular facets of most cancers care coordination, comparable to symptomology (12, 14, 23, 27, 52), remedy adherence (23, 34, 38, 45, 66), and ambulatory surgical procedure (7, 8). Analysis utilizing apps designed to enhance well being associated high quality of life targeted on normal life-style administration (30, 42, 56, 60, 64, 69), weight administration (61, 66, 67), despair and breast most cancers associated misery (12, 17, 21, 23, 37, 63), social assist (12, 40, 50, 51), sleep (20), and bodily exercise throughout and after a breast most cancers analysis (9, 11, 22, 24, 25, 28, 29, 33, 35, 36, 46, 55, 59, 65). Using cellular apps for tertiary most cancers prevention was most well-liked in distinction to regular commonplace of care practices. For instance, a number of research reported that most cancers sufferers and survivors have been keen, and had a desire for, receiving scientific care coordination assist (13, 15, 16) and health-related high quality of life interventions (53, 62) by apps.
Along with the 2 essential themes recognized, we additionally discovered that tertiary prevention apps have been used to enhance measurement and supply real-time information for evaluation and prediction. For instance, Timmerman et al. subjectively measured fatigue in 18 most cancers survivors by administering the Visible Analog Scale on a smartphone 3 occasions per day (25). As well as, Langer et al. had most cancers affected person and partner dyads systematically document their ideas by way of a wise telephone twice a day for 14 consecutive days to evaluate communication (51). Data collected from cellular apps was additionally validated in opposition to different metrics. As an example, Kim et al. discovered that each day self-reported despair scores collected by a cellular mental-health utility offered comparable outcomes as conventional one-time in-clinic evaluation of despair and that greater accuracy of despair was achieved with better adherence to cellular app use (21). Lastly, data collected by way of cellular purposes was utilized to enhance prediction of breast cancer-specific mortality and breast most cancers recurrence (31, 57). Whereas threat modeling is a standard device utilized in scientific observe to tell people of their particular person most cancers threat, Parades-Aracil et al. built-in these threat fashions into an app making the danger measurement device extra accessible for scientific use.
The overwhelming majority of the apps we recognized for scientific care coordination weren’t named within the research or publicly out there, however moderately developed for every particular research. In distinction, research utilizing apps to enhance well being associated high quality of life have been extra available for public use within the Apple and/or Android app retailer (Determine 5).

Determine 5. Names and variety of publicly-available apps used for breast most cancers prevention analysis (n = 69 distinctive research). Twenty-one research excluded as a result of no app identify was offered or no app was developed. *Title offered at request of writer.
Secondary Prevention
We recognized 9 research (8 distinctive) that used apps for secondary breast most cancers prevention within the following phases: growth (37.5%), feasibility (25%), pilot (12.5%), and effectiveness (62.5%); with three articles reporting on a number of research phases (see Desk 2).

Desk 2. Articles utilizing cellular apps for secondary breast most cancers prevention (n = 9 eligible research).
We recognized just one theme within the research of secondary prevention; with one exception (72), all research that concerned human topics have been effectiveness research that focused breast most cancers screening behaviors, particularly amongst underserved populations and high-risk girls (18, 19, 73–75). For instance, Eden et al. discovered that amongst rural girls aged 40–49 years, apps have been efficient at lowering decisional battle and growing self-efficacy round mammography (73). Two research used cellular apps to extend breast-screening practices in Korean girls. Heo et al. efficiently launched an app to extend breast self-examination amongst younger Korean girls (common 29.5 ± 5.9 years) (19). As well as, Lee et al. discovered that compared to the same old care management group that acquired a printed brochure, Korean American girls within the intervention group that acquired entry to a cellular mammography app with well being navigator companies, confirmed considerably elevated data of breast most cancers and better readiness for mammography (75). Just like Lee et al., different research additionally examined if breast most cancers screening is improved when pairing cellular apps with neighborhood well being navigators (18, 74).
Two developmental research used apps to innovate breast most cancers detection methods. The SmartIHC-Analyzer cellular app automates scoring of Ki-67 protein, a trademark for assessing cell proliferation price throughout most cancers development (76). The Pixel Picker cellular app quickly detects breast most cancers cells (10).
With one exception (10), not one of the cellular apps for secondary prevention have been publicly out there on the time of this evaluation (Determine 5).
Major Prevention
We recognized 10 articles (9 distinctive) that targeted on the usage of cellular apps for major breast most cancers prevention (see Desk 3). The articles ranged throughout the next analysis phases: growth (30%), feasibility (20%), protocols (20%), and effectiveness (30%).

Desk 3. Articles utilizing cellular apps for major breast most cancers prevention (n = 10 eligible research).
We recognized three frequent themes for the usage of cellular well being apps in major breast most cancers prevention: data and adherence to screening pointers, the focusing on of high-risk populations, and the incorporation of theoretical frameworks. Major prevention research targeted on apps that elevated breast most cancers prevention data and adherence to breast most cancers pointers and surveillance (77, 79, 80, 83–85). Six of the 9 research used present pointers to tell their apps (77, 80, 81, 83, 85). For instance, in designing an app to assist girls cut back their threat of breast most cancers by wholesome behaviors, Coughlin et al. (81) included evidence-based data offered by the Nationwide Most cancers Institute, the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention, and the American Most cancers Society. As well as, a protocol research that offered wholesome meals recipes by the app aimed to evaluate adherence to food plan and bodily exercise pointers for most cancers survivors set out by the American Institute for Most cancers Analysis (85) and the investigators of an effectiveness research primarily based the content material of their app on the Saudi Most cancers Basis pointers (77). 4 research targeted on encouraging wholesome behaviors that lowered the danger of breast most cancers (78, 81, 82, 85).
The focused inhabitants for these major prevention research was primarily girls at excessive threat for breast most cancers (77, 79, 80, 82, 83) together with post-menopausal girls with excessive Gail threat scores (82), BRCA mutation carriers (79, 80), and African American girls, who expertise better breast most cancers disparities (85). Some research additionally focused broader populations that engaged in behaviors related to greater breast most cancers threat, comparable to smoking (78) and night time shift work (26). Within the latter, Loef et al. described the protocol for an observational cohort of well being staff within the Netherlands by which an app will probably be used to gather each day measures of an infection to research how night time shift work impacts well being outcomes which might be associated to carcinogenesis (26). Subsequently, apps are used each to extend data about breast most cancers threat and prevention in focused populations (78, 85), in addition to to establish new threat elements in excessive threat populations (26).
Lots of the major prevention research included theoretical frameworks for habits change. The event research included the Frequent Sense Mannequin of Habits Principle (81), Well being Data Mannequin (83), and the Messaging Mannequin for Well being Communication Campaigns framework (80). One protocol research used each the Well being Perception Principle and Principle of Deliberate Habits Fashions (64). One effectiveness research primarily based their research design on a Social Cognitive Principle (82). Not one of the feasibility research talked about a theoretical framework.
Along with the three themes, we discovered that a number of key ideas have been important to implementing major prevention analysis with apps, together with literacy (particular to well being and ehealth), self-efficacy (with a distinction between lively and passive data looking for), and user-friendly scheduling instruments. For instance, literacy and self-efficacy have been essential in a research amongst faculty girls that utilized a family-based life course method to breast most cancers prevention (83). Given college-age girls might undertake wholesome existence which might be essential for most cancers threat discount, Kratze et al. discovered that the app proved helpful in data switch of breast well being consciousness whereas additionally helping in daughter-initiated communication with their moms concerning screenings and well being data. The necessity for user-friendly instruments, comparable to scheduling assistants, emerged in a research of guideline adherence amongst BRCA carriers. Though their consciousness of surveillance pointers was excessive, adherence was low and half of respondents indicated they’d a troublesome time remembering to schedule appointments (79). Thus, the app was designed to remind customers when to hunt care customized to their very own threat elements. Using apps was notably useful in growing effectiveness of behavioral interventions as a result of they enabled dynamic tailoring within the case of smoking cessation (78) and simpler self-monitoring within the case of monitoring food plan and bodily exercise (85).
With regard to app availability, 4 research used publicly-available apps (Determine 5) (77, 79, 82, 84). Different research used pre-existing apps, together with My Health Pal (82), Snapchat (77), or included their customized app for use with FitBit and LoseIt! (81). The research whose apps weren’t publicly-available both developed apps for analysis functions solely (85) or didn’t point out particular details about their app (26, 83). For one research, the writer offered the app identify upon contact (78).
Dialogue
This systematic evaluation summarizes the rising literature for breast most cancers prevention analysis utilizing cellular apps. Whereas we discovered research throughout the most cancers management continuum, the vast majority of research used cellular apps to focus on tertiary prevention, notably scientific care coordination and health-related high quality of life for breast most cancers survivors, in addition to to enhance the measurement and evaluation of signs, behaviors, and threat. Fewer cellular apps have been used for secondary and first prevention the place outcomes have been associated to growing self-efficacy and screening behaviors and monitoring and managing well being behaviors. The research reviewed spanned all phases of analysis in numerous populations in practically 20 nations. Using apps in breast most cancers analysis has been growing since 2010, a pattern that may possible proceed. Given the ubiquity of smartphones and international burden of breast most cancers, there’s potential for cellular apps to affect breast most cancers traits throughout the globe.
Progress Since Earlier Evaluations
Earlier evaluations have explored the usage of most cancers apps, however weren’t systematically carried out (86), particular to breast most cancers (87), or targeted on analysis (4). That being stated, our findings counsel that a few of the gaps recognized by previous evaluations have begun to be addressed. Specifically, we recognized that most of the major prevention research have been grounded in theoretical frameworks and have been tailor-made to totally different cultural and literacy ranges, key factors that weren’t being addressed beforehand as recognized by Coughlin et al. (86). Just like Coughlin et al. (86) and Giunti et al. (4), we additionally discovered that almost all of breast most cancers apps have been designed for tertiary prevention. We additional noticed that in research of secondary and first prevention, many apps present details about pointers for early detection of breast most cancers for ladies recognized as excessive threat. Nonetheless, on condition that early onset breast most cancers is growing even in girls and not using a household historical past of breast most cancers, bigger scale prevention interventions must be thought-about for extra populations that present threat fashions and screening methods don’t establish. We additionally discovered that apps might be tailored for research throughout the most cancers management continuum on condition that wholesome behaviors advisable for major and tertiary prevention overlap. Thus, on this quickly rising subject, whereas some gaps have been addressed, others gaps and implementation alternatives are rising.
Analysis Gaps by Most cancers Prevention Sorts
Tertiary Prevention Gaps
Provided that breast most cancers is essentially the most generally recognized most cancers in girls globally (88) and there are an estimated 3.5 million breast most cancers survivors within the US alone (89), it is smart that almost all of the apps have been targeted on scientific care coordination and well being associated high quality of life. Nearly all of the apps we recognized for tertiary breast most cancers prevention have been patient- or survivor-oriented; subsequently, they required adherence from the affected person/survivor. Whereas this might place a substantial burden on sufferers/survivors, the repeat and real-time proof gleaned will be invaluable for sufferers/survivors when it comes to self-management. Moreover, a small proportion (16%) of research utilizing apps for tertiary most cancers prevention have been effectiveness research. Given the rising charges of breast most cancers incidence in low-middle revenue nations (90), extra research are wanted to indicate the effectiveness of app use, particularly in low useful resource settings.
Secondary Prevention Gaps
Whereas a better proportion of secondary prevention research have been on the effectiveness stage, we discovered blended proof that apps may modify breast most cancers screening behaviors, particularly amongst at-risk populations. Lee et al. confirmed {that a} cellular phone-app primarily based intervention, together with well being navigator companies, may successfully enhance breast most cancers data and readiness for mammography (75). Ginsberg et al. additionally explored the effectiveness of an app, with or and not using a well being navigator service, to extend Bangladeshi girls’s adherence to attend a clinic-visit after an irregular scientific breast examination; nevertheless, no vital outcomes have been discovered (74). Equally, an app along side genetic scientific counseling didn’t change girls’s private notion of threat (18). Effectiveness research must assess if an app may ship substantial good points in secondary breast most cancers prevention outcomes (e.g., schooling, screening), alone or together with different companies. Furthermore, given early detection of breast most cancers is related to better survival charges, effectiveness research that assess outcomes for the implementation of revolutionary breast most cancers screening/detection apps in comparison with commonplace of care, could be of nice worth. That is very true for areas the place there are obstacles to mammography screening and/or well timed point-of-care diagnostics.
Major Prevention Gaps
Nearly all of major prevention research have been aimed toward enhancing the switch of data and adherence to present most cancers prevention pointers amongst girls at excessive threat for breast most cancers; nevertheless, much less analysis has been carried out with populations at common threat, or on modifiable threat elements to stop breast most cancers. Focused prevention to high-risk populations is logical on condition that with restricted sources and competing illness threat, sources must be allotted to those that will profit most. Nonetheless, if sustaining wholesome weight, food plan and bodily exercise can cut back most cancers incidence by 26% (91), then apps can assist promote sustainable, scalable behavioral change that reduces the danger for a lot of extra persistent ailments (e.g., coronary heart illness, diabetes) for ladies at common threat as properly.
International Implementation Implications
As of early 2019, there have been over 5.1 billion cell phone subscribers and this quantity is rising given the typical annual % enhance of two.9% (92). One may argue that the adoption of smartphone use is quicker than the speed of an epidemic. With smartphones, people are readily, in actual time, self-monitoring well being behaviors. And leveraging this self-tracking for the implementation of breast most cancers prevention is at our fingertips. Our evaluation means that the usage of apps for breast most cancers prevention is far-reaching. The worldwide rise in incidence charges of breast most cancers coupled with a speedy uptake of cellular platforms creates distinctive prevention alternatives. That being stated, it’s unclear if the usage of apps for breast most cancers prevention will mitigate or create better gaps in well being disparities (93). Whereas low to center revenue nations have skilled speedy uptake of cellular platforms (94), in these rising markets, the younger, well-educated and higher-income people are extra possible to make use of these cellular platforms (93). Thus, an unintended consequence is the creation of breast most cancers well being disparities in low useful resource settings; particularly for secondary and tertiary prevention. However, considerate app developments and implementation of mHealth instruments may result in extra inclusive moderately than marginalized analysis (93).
Alternatives and Suggestions of Cell App Use Throughout the Most cancers Management Continuum
Given our evaluation, we spotlight the next alternatives and/or suggestions with regard to the usage of apps throughout the breast most cancers management continuum:
Analysis is required to know the effectiveness of cellular apps for breast most cancers major prevention in girls at common threat, however particularly in younger girls. The incidence of invasive breast most cancers in younger girls (age 25–39 years) has risen within the US with an annual % change of two.7% for white non-Hispanic girls and three.1% for black non-Hispanic girls from 1976 to 2009 (1). Furthermore, whereas international incidence charges for younger girls underneath 50 years are comparable, impartial of country-level revenue, mortality charges are greater in girls in low-middle revenue and low-income nations (95). Many behavioral threat elements for breast most cancers are modifiable, so the potential affect of app know-how for breast most cancers prevention in younger girls is especially highly effective on condition that this age group has come of age with apps and they don’t have to be taught or satisfied of their usefulness (93).
Breast most cancers apps must be available. Solely about half of the apps in our evaluation have been publicly out there within the Apple and/or Android app retailer. Nearly all of apps available for public use have been well being associated apps; whereas, apps catering to secondary prevention (breast most cancers screening/detection) and tertiary prevention (persevering with most cancers care) weren’t available. Even for major prevention, Cohen et al. discovered that over 200 potential customers from 68 nations outdoors of the US tried to entry the SNAP for BRCA app, however potential customers couldn’t obtain the app because it required a research code (79). With out making developed apps available and usable, there’s restricted chance of updating, adapting, validating, disseminating, or additional testing the app for effectiveness in numerous populations and settings. Researchers must also reap the benefits of already out there apps, particularly widespread ones (e.g., Fitbit, Headspace), as there’s much less upfront particular person time and monetary bills in comparison with de novo app growth. Fashionable apps carry the good thing about having a robust infrastructure on condition that software program is routinely up to date, designs are improved, and new options are added (82). Nonetheless, an inherent limitation of available apps is that the velocity of the analysis doesn’t usually advance on the velocity of cellular app know-how; subsequently, researchers have restricted management over app developments and the modifications that will immediately or not directly affect the research.
Researchers ought to capitalize on the chance apps present to gather data on exposures and outcomes of curiosity which have historically been troublesome to measure. Not solely does cellular app know-how permit researchers to acquire repeat real-time information, cellular information measurement and assortment reduces in-person research workers help, whereas not totally changing research workers. Research workers will possible stay important, particularly for research implementation in low-middle revenue and laborious to achieve populations (84).
Limitations
This evaluation isn’t with out limitations. First, the arrival of cellular apps is comparatively latest and analysis on this space is quickly altering. In consequence, articles might have been missed that weren’t listed with the search phrases chosen. To counteract this chance, we broadened our search to incorporate the full-text moderately than simply MeSH or key phrases. Second, our evaluation might also be lacking research that addressed breast most cancers threat elements, comparable to weight problems, however don’t make an specific reference to breast most cancers. This possible deflated the variety of articles recognized as major prevention; nevertheless, a extra exhaustive evaluation of all cellular apps getting used for breast most cancers threat elements was past the scope of this research. Lastly, we included two databases in our search technique, so grey literature and scientific trials with unpublished findings weren’t included.
Conclusions
Using cellular apps for breast most cancers prevention analysis is quickly rising. Our systematic evaluation means that whereas some gaps recognized in earlier evaluations have already been addressed, new challenges have emerged. For cellular app interventions to have a world affect throughout the most cancers management continuum, researchers might want to proceed to spend money on major and secondary prevention analysis research, in addition to research which might be farther alongside within the analysis section, to be able to display the potential affect on outcomes related to breast most cancers.
Writer Contributions
LH and JM conceptualized the research and all authors (LH, RH, JM) formulated the research design. RH managed the literature search and reviewed all articles and LH and JM independently reviewed a subset of articles. All authors drafted the preliminary manuscript, reviewed and revised the ultimate manuscript for important and essential mental content material, accredited the ultimate manuscript, and comply with be accountable for all facets of the work.
Funding
The Nationwide Most cancers Institute supported each JM (5 K01 CA186943) and LH (5 K07 CA218166).
Battle of Curiosity
The authors declare that the analysis was carried out within the absence of any industrial or monetary relationships that might be construed as a possible battle of curiosity.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the organizers of the eighth Worldwide Breast Most cancers and Diet Symposium for the wonderful suggestions that inspired this evaluation throughout our session on mobilizing breast most cancers analysis by smartphone apps. We might additionally prefer to thank Ms. Eisha Nasar for producing the map included on this evaluation.
Supplementary Materials
The Supplementary Materials for this text will be discovered on-line at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00298/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Johnson RH, Chien FL, Bleyer A. Incidence of breast most cancers with distant involvement amongst girls in the US, 1976 to 2009. JAMA. (2013) 309:800–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.776
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
2. Sanson-Fisher RW, D’Este CA, Carey ML, Noble N, Paul CL. Analysis of systems-oriented public well being interventions: various analysis designs. Annu Rev Public Well being. (2014) 35:9–27. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182445
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
3. Bender JL, Yue RYK, To MJ, Deacken L, Jadad AR. Plenty of motion, however not in the suitable route: systematic evaluation and content material evaluation of smartphone purposes for the prevention, detection, and administration of most cancers. J Med Web Res. (2013) 15:e287. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2661
4. Giunti G, Giunta DH, Guisado-Fernandez E, Bender JL, Fernandez-Luque L. A biopsy of breast most cancers cellular purposes: state of the observe evaluation. Int J Med Inform. (2018) 110:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.022
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
5. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Most popular reporting gadgets for systematic evaluations and meta-analyses: the PRISMA assertion. BMJ. (2009) 339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
7. Hwang H. Digital wound monitoring after ambulatory breast most cancers surgical procedure: enhancing affected person care and satisfaction utilizing a wise telephone app. Br Col Med J. (2016) 58:448–53.
8. Armstrong KA, Coyte PC, Brown M, Beber B, Semple JL. Impact of house monitoring by way of cellular app on the variety of in-person visits following ambulatory surgical procedure a randomized scientific trial. JAMA Surg. (2017) 152:622–7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0111
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
9. Ritvo P, Obadia M, Santa Mina D, Alibhai S, Sabiston C, Oh P, et al. Smartphone-enabled well being teaching intervention (iMOVE) to advertise long-term upkeep of bodily exercise in breast most cancers survivors: protocol for a feasibility pilot randomized managed trial. JMIR Res Protoc. (2017) 6:e165. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6615
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
10. Jiao L, Xu Z, Du W, Li H, Yin M. Quick preparation of polydopamine nanoparticles catalyzed by Fe(2+)/H2O2 for seen delicate smartphone-enabled cytosensing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. (2017) 9:28339–45. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b10564
11. Xiaosheng D, Xiangren Y, Shuyuan H, Dezong G, Mengyao C, Meng D. The results of mixed train intervention primarily based on Web and social media software program for postoperative sufferers with breast most cancers: research protocol for a randomized managed trial. Trials. (2018) 19:477. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2857-3
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
12. Zhu JM, Ebert L, Liu XY, Wei D, Chan SWC. Cell breast most cancers e-support program for chinese language girls with breast most cancers present process chemotherapy (half 2): multicenter randomized managed trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. (2018) 6:e104. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9438
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
13. Drewes C, Kirkovits T, Schiltz D, Schinkoethe T, Haidinger R, Goldmann-Posch U, et al. EHealth acceptance and new media preferences for remedy help amongst breast most cancers sufferers. JMIR Most cancers. (2016) 2:e13. doi: 10.2196/most cancers.5711
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
14. Egbring M, Far E, Roos M, Dietrich M, Brauchbar M, Kullak-Ublick GA, et al. A cellular app to stabilize each day purposeful exercise of breast most cancers sufferers in collaboration with the doctor: a randomized managed scientific trial. J Med Web Res. (2016) 18:e238. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6414
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
15. El Shafie RA, Weber D, Bougatf N, Sprave T, Oetzel D, Huber PE, et al. Supportive care in radiotherapy primarily based on a cellular app: potential multicenter survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. (2018) 6:e10916. doi: 10.2196/10916
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
16. O’Brien C, Kelly J, Lehane EA, Livingstone V, Cotter B, Butt A, et al. Validation and evaluation of a know-how familiarity rating in sufferers attending a symptomatic breast clinic. World J Surg. (2015) 39:2441–9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3134-1
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
17. Foley NM, O’Connell EP, Lehane EA, Livingstone V, Maher B, Kaimkhani S, et al. PATI: Affected person accessed tailor-made data: a pilot research to guage the impact on preoperative breast most cancers sufferers of data delivered by way of a cellular utility. Breast. (2016) 30:54–8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.08.012
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
18. Keohane D, Lehane E, Rutherford E, Livingstone V, Kelly L, Kaimkhani S, et al. Can an academic utility enhance threat notion accuracy amongst sufferers attending a high-risk breast most cancers clinic? Breast. (2017) 32:192–8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.009
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
19. Heo J, Chun M, Lee KY, Oh YT, Noh OK, Park RW. Results of a smartphone utility on breast self-examination: a feasibility research. Healthc Inform Res. (2013) 19:250–60. doi: 10.4258/hir.2013.19.4.250
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
20. Min YH, Lee JW, Shin YW, Jo MW, Sohn G, Lee JH, et al. Each day assortment of self-reporting sleep disturbance information by way of a smartphone app in breast most cancers sufferers receiving chemotherapy: a feasibility research. J Med Web Res. (2014) 16:e135. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3421
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
21. Kim J, Lim S, Min YH, Shin YW, Lee B, Sohn G, et al. Despair screening utilizing each day mental-health scores from a smartphone utility for breast most cancers sufferers. J Med Web Res. (2016) 18:e216. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5598
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
22. Uhm KE, Yoo JS, Chung SH, Lee JD, Lee I, Kim JI, et al. Results of train intervention in breast most cancers sufferers: is cellular well being (mHealth) with pedometer simpler than typical program utilizing brochure? Breast Most cancers Res Deal with. (2017) 161:443–52. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4065-8
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
23. Kim HJ, Kim SM, Shin H, Jang JS, Kim YI, Han DH. A cellular recreation for sufferers with breast most cancers for chemotherapy self-management and quality-of-life enchancment: randomized managed trial. J Med Web Res. (2018) 20:e273. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9559
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
24. Park SW, Lee I, Kim JI, Park H, Lee JD, Uhm KE, et al. Elements related to bodily exercise of breast most cancers sufferers taking part in train intervention. Help Care Most cancers. (2019) 27:1747–54. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4427-3
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
25. Timmerman JG, Dekker-van Weering MGH, Tonis TM, Hermens HJ, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR. Relationship between patterns of each day bodily exercise and fatigue in most cancers survivors. Eur J Oncol Nurs. (2015) 19:162–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.09.005
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
26. Loef B, van Baarle D, van der Beek AJ, van Kerkhof LW, van de Langenberg D, Correct KI. Klokwerk plus research protocol: an observational research to the consequences of night-shift work on physique weight and an infection susceptibility and the mechanisms underlying these well being results. BMC Public Well being. (2016) 16:692. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3317-1
27. Younger-Afat DA, van Gils CH, Bruinvels DJ, van der Pol CC, Witkamp AJ, Sijtsema S, et al. Sufferers’ and well being care suppliers’ opinions on a supportive well being app throughout breast most cancers therapy: a qualitative analysis. JMIR Most cancers. (2016) 2:e8. doi: 10.2196/most cancers.5334
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
28. Douma JAJ, Verheul HMW, Buffart LM. Feasibility, validity and reliability of goal smartphone measurements of bodily exercise and health in sufferers with most cancers. BMC Most cancers. (2018) 18:1052. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4983-4
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
29. Ormel HL, van der Schoot GGF, Westerink NDL, Sluiter WJ, Gietema JA, Walenkamp AME. Self-monitoring bodily exercise with a smartphone utility in most cancers sufferers: a randomized feasibility research (SMART-trial). Help Care Most cancers. (2018) 26:3915–23. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4263-5
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
30. Lozano-Lozano M, Martin-Martin L, Galiano-Castillo N, Alvarez-Salvago F, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernandez-Lao C, et al. Integral technique to supportive care in breast most cancers survivors by occupational remedy and a m-health system: design of a randomized scientific trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. (2016) 16:150. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0394-0
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
31. Paredes-Aracil E, Palazon-Bru A, Folgado-de la Rosa DM, Ots-Gutierrez JR, Compan-Rosique AF, Gil-Guillen VF. A scoring system to foretell breast most cancers mortality at 5 and 10 years. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:415. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00536-7
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
32. Weaver A, Love SB, Larsen M, Shanyinde M, Waters R, Grainger L, et al. A pilot research: dose adaptation of capecitabine utilizing cell phone toxicity monitoring–supporting sufferers of their properties. Help Care Most cancers. (2014) 22:2677–85. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2224-1
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
33. Tougher H, Holroyd P, Burkinshaw L, Watten P, Zammit C, Harris PR, et al. A user-centred method to creating bWell, a cellular app for arm and shoulder workouts after breast most cancers therapy. J Most cancers Surviv. (2017) 11:732–42. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0630-3
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
34. Brett J, Boulton M, Watson E. Growth of an e-health app to assist girls prescribed adjuvant endocrine remedy after therapy for breast most cancers. Affected person Want Adher. (2018) 12:2639–47. doi: 10.2147/ppa.s187692
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
35. Roberts AL, Potts HWW, Koutoukidis DA, Smith L, Fisher A. Breast, prostate, and colorectal most cancers survivors’ experiences of utilizing publicly out there bodily exercise cellular apps: qualitative research. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. (2019) 7:e10918. doi: 10.2196/10918
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
36. Ainsworth MC, Pekmezi D, Bowles H, Ehlers D, McAuley E, Courneya KS, et al. Acceptability of a cell phone app for measuring time use in breast most cancers survivors (life in a day): mixed-methods research. JMIR Most cancers. (2018) 4:e9. doi: 10.2196/most cancers.8951
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
37. Akechi T, Yamaguchi T, Uchida M, Imai F, Momino Ok, Katsuki F, et al. Smartphone problem-solving and behavioural activation remedy to scale back worry of recurrence amongst sufferers with breast most cancers (SMartphone Intervention to LEssen worry of most cancers recurrence: SMILE challenge): protocol for a randomised managed trial. BMJ Open. (2018) 8:e024794. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024794
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
38. Ali EE, Leow JL, Chew L, Yap KY. Sufferers’ notion of app-based academic and behavioural interventions for enhancing oral anticancer remedy adherence. J Most cancers Educ. (2018) 33:1306–13. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1248-x
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
39. Armstrong KA, Coyte PC, Bhatia RS, Semple JL. The impact of cellular app house monitoring on variety of in-person visits following ambulatory surgical procedure: protocol for a randomized managed trial. JMIR Res Protoc. (2015) 4:e65. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4352
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
40. Banas JR, Victorson D, Gutierrez S, Cordero E, Guitleman J, Haas N. Growing a peer-to-peer mHealth utility to attach hispanic most cancers sufferers. J Most cancers Educ. (2017) 32:158–65. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1066-6
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
42. Buscemi J, Buitrago D, Iacobelli F, Penedo F, Maciel C, Guitleman J, et al. Feasibility of a smartphone-based pilot intervention for Hispanic breast most cancers survivors: a short report. Transl Behav Med. (2019) 9:638–45. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby058
43. Iacobelli F, Adler RF, Buitrago D, Buscemi J, Corden ME, Perez-Tamayo A, et al. Designing an mHealth utility to bridge well being disparities in Latina breast most cancers survivors: a community-supported design method. Design Well being (Abingdon). (2018) 2:58–76. doi: 10.1080/24735132.2018.1452871
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
44. Yanez BR, Buitrago D, Buscemi J, Iacobelli F, Adler RF, Corden ME, et al. Research design and protocol for My Information: an e-health intervention to enhance patient-centered outcomes amongst Hispanic breast most cancers survivors. Contemp Clin Trials. (2018) 65:61–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.11.018
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
45. Chalela P, Munoz E, Inupakutika D, Kaghyan S, Akopian D, Kaklamani V, et al. Bettering adherence to endocrine hormonal remedy amongst breast most cancers sufferers: Research protocol for a randomized managed trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. (2018) 12:109–15. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.10.001
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
46. Delrieu L, Perol O, Fervers B, Friedenreich C, Vallance J, Febvey-Combes O, et al. A customized bodily exercise program with exercise trackers and a cell phone app for sufferers with metastatic breast most cancers: protocol for a single-arm feasibility trial. JMIR Res Protoc. (2018) 7:e10487. doi: 10.2196/10487
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
47. Gehrke A, Lee SS, Hilton Ok, Ganster B, Trupp R, McCullough C, et al. Growth of the most cancers survivor profile-breast most cancers (CSPro-BC) app: affected person and nurse views on a brand new navigation device. J Most cancers Surviv. (2018) 12:291–305. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0668-2
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
48. Klasnja P, Hartzler A, Powell C, Pratt W. Supporting most cancers sufferers’ unanchored well being data administration with cellular know-how. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. (2011) 2011:732–41.
49. Klasnja P, Hartzler A, Powell C, Phan G, Pratt W. Well being weaver cellular: designing a cellular device for managing private well being data throughout most cancers care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. (2010) 2010:392–6.
50. Kubo A, Altschuler A, Kurtovich E, Hendlish S, Laurent CA, Kolevska T, et al. A pilot mobile-based mindfulness intervention for most cancers sufferers and their casual caregivers. Mindfulness. (2018) 9:1885–94. doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-0931-2
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
51. Langer SL, Romano JM, Todd M, Strauman TJ, Keefe FJ, Syrjala KL, et al. Hyperlinks between communication and relationship satisfaction amongst sufferers with most cancers and their spouses: outcomes of a fourteen-day smartphone-based ecological momentary evaluation research. Entrance Psychol. (2018) 9:1843. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01843
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
52. Langius-Eklof A, Crafoord MT, Christiansen M, Fjell M, Sundberg Ok. Results of an interactive mHealth innovation for early detection of patient-reported symptom misery with give attention to participatory care: protocol for a research primarily based on potential, randomised, managed trials in sufferers with prostate and breast most cancers. BMC Most cancers. (2017) 17:466. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3450-y
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
53. Lloyd GR, Oza S, Kozey-Keadle S, Pellegrini CA, Conroy DE, Penedo FJ, et al. Breast most cancers survivors’ beliefs and preferences concerning technology-supported sedentary habits discount interventions. AIMS Public Well being. (2016) 3:592–614. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.592
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
54. Lozano-Lozano M, Galiano-Castillo N, Martin-Martin L, Tempo-Bedetti N, Fernandez-Lao C, Arroyo-Morales M, et al. Monitoring vitality stability in breast most cancers survivors utilizing a cellular app: reliability research. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. (2018) 6:e67. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9669
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
55. Lyons EJ, Baranowski T, Basen-Engquist KM, Lewis ZH, Swartil MC, Jennings Ok, et al. Testing the consequences of narrative and play on bodily exercise amongst breast most cancers survivors utilizing cellular apps: research protocol for a randomized managed trial. BMC Most cancers. (2016) 16:202. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2244-y
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
56. McCarroll ML, Armbruster S, Pohle-Krauza RJ, Lyzen AM, Min S, Nash DW, et al. Feasibility of a way of life intervention for obese/overweight endometrial and breast most cancers survivors utilizing an interactive cellular utility. Gynecol Oncol. (2015) 137:508–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.025
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
57. Paredes-Aracil E, Palazon-Bru A, Folgado-de la Rosa DM, Ots-Gutierrez JR, Llorca-Ferrandiz C, Alonso-Hernandez S, et al. A scoring system to foretell recurrence in breast most cancers sufferers. Surg Oncol. (2018) 27:681–7. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.09.005
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
58. Lee HY, Lee MH, Gao Z, Sadak Ok. Growth and analysis of culturally and linguistically tailor-made cellular app to advertise breast most cancers screening. J Clin Med. (2018) 7:E181. doi: 10.3390/jcm7080181
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
59. Phillips SM, Collins LM, Penedo FJ, Courneya KS, Welch W, Cottrell A, et al. Optimization of a technology-supported bodily exercise intervention for breast most cancers survivors: Fit2Thrive research protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. (2018) 66:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.01.001
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
60. Pope Z, Lee JE, Zeng N, Lee HY, Gao Z. Feasibility of smartphone utility and social media intervention on breast most cancers survivors’ well being outcomes. Transl Behav Med. (2019) 9:11–22. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby002
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
61. Quintiliani LM, Mann DM, Puputti M, Quinn E, Bowen DJ. Pilot and feasibility check of a cellular health-supported behavioral counseling intervention for weight administration amongst breast most cancers survivors. JMIR Most cancers. (2016) 2:e4. doi: 10.2196/most cancers.5305
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
62. Raghunathan NJ, Korenstein D, Li QS, Tonorezos ES, Mao JJ. Determinants of cellular know-how use and smartphone utility curiosity in most cancers sufferers. Most cancers Med. (2018) 7:5812–9. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1660
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
63. Rosen KD, Paniagua SM, Kazanis W, Jones S, Potter JS. High quality of life amongst girls recognized with breast most cancers: a randomized waitlist managed trial of commercially out there cellular app-delivered mindfulness coaching. Psychooncology. (2018) 27:2023–30. doi: 10.1002/pon.4764
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
64. Smith SA, Whitehead MS, Sheats JQ, Fontenot B, Alema-Mensah E, Ansa B. Formative analysis to develop a way of life utility (app) for African American breast most cancers survivors. J Ga Public Well being Assoc. (2016) 6:50–9. doi: 10.21633/jgpha.6.103
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
65. Soto-Perez-De-Celis E, Kim H, Rojo-Castillo MP, Solar CL, Chavarri-Guerra Y, Navarrete-Reyes AP, et al. A pilot research of an accelerometer-equipped smartphone to observe older adults with most cancers receiving chemotherapy in Mexico. J Geriatr Oncol. (2018) 9:145–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.09.008
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
66. Stubbins R, He T, Yu X, Puppala M, Ezeana CF, Chen S, et al. A behavior-modification, clinical-grade cellular utility to enhance breast most cancers survivors’ accountability and well being outcomes. JCO Clin Most cancers Inform. (2018) 2:1–11. doi: 10.1200/cci.18.00054
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
67. Valle CG, Deal AM, Tate DF. Stopping weight achieve in African American breast most cancers survivors utilizing good scales and exercise trackers: a randomized managed pilot research. J Most cancers Surviv. (2017) 11:133–48. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0571-2
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
68. Walker DK, Hardeman A, Owen L, Frank JS. Data on the level of care an informational utility for most cancers sources. Cin Comput Inform Nurs. (2015) 33:390–5. doi: 10.1097/cin.0000000000000171
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
70. Zhu J, Ebert L, Guo D, Yang S, Han Q, Chan SW. Cell breast most cancers e-support program for Chinese language girls with breast most cancers present process chemotherapy (half 1): qualitative research of girls’s perceptions. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. (2018) 6:e85. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9311
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
71. Zhu J, Ebert L, Liu X, Chan SW. A cellular utility of breast most cancers e-support program versus routine care within the therapy of Chinese language girls with breast most cancers present process chemotherapy: research protocol for a randomized managed trial. BMC Most cancers. (2017) 17:291. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3276-7
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
72. Cardos RAI, Soflau R, Gherman A, Sucala M, Chiorean A. A cellular intervention for core needle biopsy associated ache and anxiousness: a usability research. J Evid Primarily based Psychother. (2017) 17:21–30. doi: 10.24193/jebp.2017.1.2
73. Eden KB, Scariati P, Klein Ok, Watson L, Remiker M, Hribar M, et al. Mammography choice support reduces decisional battle for ladies of their forties contemplating screening. J Womens Well being (Larchmt). (2015) 24:1013–20. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5256
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
74. Ginsburg OM, Chowdhury M, Wu W, Chowdhury M, Pal BC, Hasan R, et al. An mHealth mannequin to extend clinic attendance for breast signs in rural Bangladesh: can bridging the digital divide assist shut the most cancers divide? Oncologist. (2014) 19:177–85. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0314
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
75. Lee H, Ghebre R, Le C, Jang YJ, Sharratt M, Yee D. Cell phone multilevel and multimedia messaging intervention for breast most cancers screening: pilot randomized managed trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. (2017) 5:e154. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7091
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
76. Tewary S, Arun I, Ahmed R, Chatterjee S, Chakraborty C. SmartIHC-Analyzer: smartphone assisted microscopic picture analytics for automated Ki-67 quantification in breast most cancers analysis. Anal Strategies. (2017) 9:6161–70. doi: 10.1039/c7ay02302b
77. Alanzi TM, Alobrah A, Alhumaidi R, Aloraifi S. Analysis of the SnapChat cellular social networking utility for breast most cancers consciousness amongst Saudi college students within the Dammam Area of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Breast Most cancers. (2018) 10:113–9. doi: 10.2147/bctt.s166135
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
78. Businelle MS, Ma P, Kendzor DE, Frank SG, Wetter DW, Vidrine DJ. Utilizing intensive longitudinal information collected by way of cell phone to detect imminent lapse in people who smoke present process a scheduled stop try. J Med Web Res. (2016) 18:e275. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6307
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
79. Cohen SA, Scherr CL, Nixon DM. An iPhone utility intervention to advertise surveillance amongst girls with a BRCA mutation: pre-intervention information. J Genet Couns. (2018) 27:446–56. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0224-x
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
80. Scherr CL, Feuston JL, Nixon DM, Cohen SA. A two-phase method to creating SNAP: an iPhone utility to assist appointment scheduling and administration for ladies with a BRCA mutation. J Genet Couns. (2018) 27:439–45. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0222-z
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
81. Coughlin SS, Besenyi GM, Bowen D, De Leo G. Growth of the Bodily exercise and Your Diet for Most cancers (PYNC) smartphone app for stopping breast most cancers in girls. Mhealth. (2017) 3:5. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.02.02
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
82. Hartman SJ, Nelson SH, Cadmus-Bertram LA, Patterson RE, Parker BA, Pierce JP. Know-how- and phone-based weight reduction intervention: pilot RCT in girls at elevated breast most cancers threat. Am J Prev Med. (2016) 51:714–21. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.024
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
83. Kratzke C, Amatya A, Vilchis H. Variations amongst faculty girls for breast most cancers prevention acquired information-seeking, desired apps and texts, and daughter-initiated data to moms. J Neighborhood Well being. (2014) 39:291–300. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9759-9
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
84. Bravo C, O’Donoghue C, Kaplan CP, Luce J, Ozanne E. Can mHealth enhance threat evaluation in underserved populations? Acceptability of a breast well being questionnaire app in ethnically numerous, older, low-income girls. J Well being Dispar Res Pract. (2014) 7:6.
85. Smith SA, Whitehead MS, Sheats J, Mastromonico J, Yoo W, Coughlin SS. A community-engaged method to creating a cellular most cancers prevention app: the mCPA research protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. (2016) 5:e34. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5290
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
88. World Well being Group. International Standing Report on Noncommunicable Ailments 2014. Geneva: World Well being Group (2014).
89. American Most cancers Society. Most cancers Remedy & Survivorship: Information & Figures 2016–2017. Atlanta, GA: American Most cancers Society (2016).
90. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. International most cancers incidence and mortality charges and traits–an replace. Most cancers Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2016) 25:16–27. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0578
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
94. DeSantis CE, Bray F, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Anderson BO, Jemal A. Worldwide variation in feminine breast most cancers incidence and mortality charges. Most cancers Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2015) 24:1495–506. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0535
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
95. Bellanger M, Zeinomar N, Tehranifar P, Terry MB. Are international breast most cancers incidence and mortality patterns associated to country-specific financial growth and prevention methods? J Glob Oncol. (2018) 4:1–16. doi: 10.1200/jgo.17.00207
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar


